Funding: This work was supported by the generosity of the Claudio

Funding: This work was supported by the generosity of the Claudio X. Gonzalez Family Foundation, the Simkins Family Foundation, the Flannery Family Foundation, the Alexander Family Foundation, the Keeling Family Foundation,

the DeSanti Family Foundation, and the McKnight Family Foundation. Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Intraoperative radiation selleck inhibitor therapy (IORT), the delivery of radiation at the time of surgery, has a long history in the annals of the clinical management of cancer patients. The earliest attempt to irradiate tumors intraoperatively dates back to 1909 when Carl Beck drew gastric and colon cancers to the abdominal incision to expose them to ionizing radiation (1). Unfortunately, these initial efforts were unsuccessful Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical due to limitations of beam energy, dose rate, and equipment. Renewed interest in IORT in more modern times came about from the increasing

clinical experience in the US and Japan using megavoltage beams in the 1970s and 1980s and the experimental studies in large animals Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in the 1980s that defined the tolerance Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical limits of normal tissues to large doses of radiation administered as a single intraoperative fraction (2,3). The distinct advantages of IORT are the ability to expose the tumor to a high dose of radiation while physically shielding or displacing adjacent critical normal structures away from the beam path, the ability to visualize the treatment field and limit set-p uncertainties, the higher biologic effectiveness of single-fraction radiation Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical therapy, the logistical convenience of substantially reducing the number of treatments, and the potential increased

radiosensitivity of oxygenated intact tumors or freshly resected tumor beds. Despite these theoretical and practical advantages, the widespread adoption of IORT has been stymied by the lack of conclusive evidence of tangible clinical benefit in randomized studies, the logistical challenges of transporting anesthetized patients to linear accelerators, and/or the additional costs involved with shielding operating rooms when the linear accelerator is relocated to the operating room. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical IORT due to the advent of mobile IORT platforms. These Brefeldin_A include the mobile linear accelerator units with in-built shielding mechanisms delivering electron beams, the flexible high-dose rate brachytherapy applicators using Ir-192, and the inhibitor Pfizer miniaturized kilovoltage X-ray sources. These technological advances coincided with the increasing interest in accelerated partial breast irradiation as a convenient, cost-effective and safe treatment alternative to full-dose conventional whole breast radiation therapy for select low-risk breast cancer patients. Therefore, the last decade has witnessed an explosion in the number of cancer centers with IORT capability, the treatment of patients with IORT worldwide, and the enrollment of patients on clinical trials evaluating IORT as a viable treatment strategy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>