1A and B). Similar profiles were seen when PS-CpG 1826 and PO-CpG 1826 sequences were tested in free or SVP-encapsulated form. Not surprisingly, PO-CpG 1826 was a less potent inducer of TNF-a production Crizotinib research buy than PS-CpG 1826, with its SVP-encapsulated form being nearly inactive, even in the more sensitive J774 cells

(Fig. 1C and D). IL-6 production in vitro followed the same pattern as TNF-a (data not shown). However, a static in vitro system does not capture potential differences in biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of free adjuvant versus nanoparticle-encapsulated adjuvant that are expected in vivo. The adjuvant activity of nanoparticle-encapsulated R848 (SVP-R848) was assessed in vivo in immunogenicity studies with a model antigen, OVA (Fig. 2). The potency of free and SVP-encapsulated R848 to induce antibodies to OVA was compared in a standard prime-boost immunization regimen. Both free and nanoparticle-encapsulated forms of OVA were tested (OVA and SVP-OVA, respectively). Additionally, R848 and OVA were either co-encapsulated in the same particle (SVP-OVA-R848) or were admixed as separate particles (SVP-R848 and SVP-OVA). When admixed with soluble OVA, SVP-R848 resulted in nearly a 10-fold increase in immunogenicity compared to free R848

after two or three injections (Fig. 2). SVP-R848 exceeded the potency of alum, an adjuvant in numerous commercially approved vaccines, by an even higher margin (antibody titer EC50 values for animals Cediranib (AZD2171) immunized with OVA in alum were below the cut-off level for the assay). Notably, the presentation of OVA by SVP also resulted in a marked increase of antibody

response (by at least 2–3 BYL719 research buy orders of magnitude) compared to free OVA with or without alum. Addition of free R848 to SVP-OVA further increased immunogenicity, especially after one or two injections, but its effect was not pronounced after the third vaccination. Free R848 was also inferior to encapsulated R848 whether it was co-encapsulated with OVA (SVP-OVA-R848) or present in a separate particle (SVP-OVA + SVP-R848). On average, co-encapsulation of OVA and R848 led to a 0.5-log increase in antibody titer compared to utilization of free R848, while admixing of SVP-OVA with SVP-R848 was more potent in antibody generation than addition of a free R848 to SVP-OVA by an order of magnitude (Fig. 2). While addition of free R848 to SVP-OVA led to a clear Th1 shift in antibody response after two injections (IgG1:IgG2c ratios of 0.28 vs. 3.13 at day 40 for SVP-OVA + R848 and SVP-OVA, correspondingly), the difference was even more pronounced if R848 was SVP-encapsulated (IgG1:IgG2c ratios of 0.08 for SVP-OVA-R848 and 0.11 for SVP-OVA + SVP-R848). Similarly, nanoparticle-encapsulated OVA and R848 induced strong local and systemic cellular immune responses (Fig. 3). Injection of nanoparticle-encapsulated R848 led to a significant influx of cells into draining lymph nodes (LN) even after a single inoculation (Fig. 3A).