73 m2 (median per year 6; IQR 3–10) was different from that in patients with normal eGFR (median per year 6; IQR 2–10; Wilcoxon P-value=0.12). The most frequently used NRTI pairs were tenofovir/emtricitabine (24%) and zidovudine/lamivudine (22%); 48% of the person-years of follow-up selleck chemicals llc (PYFU) was spent on an NNRTI-containing regimen, 28%

on a ritonavir-boosted PI-containing regimen (not including indinavir) and 11% on a single-PI-containing regimen (not including indinavir) (Table 3). Over 1412 person years of follow-up (PYFU) while patients were receiving at least one antiviral drug, we observed 96 events (confirmed eGFR decrease ≥20% from pre-cART levels), resulting in a crude incidence rate of 6.8 per 100 PYFU (95% CI 5.5–8.2). Factors independently associated with a ≥20% decrease in eGFR were female gender [relative risk (RR)

2.25 vs. male; 95% CI 1.32–3.84] and older age (RR 1.41 per 10 years older; 95% CI 1.11–1.79); compared with patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine, those currently receiving tenofovir/emtricitabine (RR 4.78; 95% CI 2.19–10.43), tenofovir/lamivudine (RR 4.20; 95% CI 1.95–9.02) or didanosine/emtricitabine (RR 11.88; 95% CI 2.27–62.18) appeared to be at increased risk of a decrease in eGFR. Similarly, patients on a PI-containing cART (even after exclusion of indinavir) were at increased risk compared with those receiving NNRTI-containing ART (RR 3.18; 95% CI 1.62–6.23 if on an old, single-PI regimen and RR 2.15; 95% CI 1.25–3.70 if on a ritonavir-boosted regimen),

PARP activity although, interestingly, patients receiving NRTIs alone were those at the highest risk (RR 9.39; 95% CI 1.79–49.42; Table 4). After controlling for the most recent CD4 cell count and viral load (as opposed to the baseline values), results were similar; in addition to the confirmed association with female gender and age, the following RR values were estimated for the comparison of NRTI pairs to zidovudine/lamivudine: tenofovir/emtricitabine, RR 4.86 (95% CI 2.28–10.34); tenofovir/lamivudine, RR 4.64 (95% CI 2.22–9.68), and didanosine/emtricitabine, Epothilone B (EPO906, Patupilone) RR 7.68 (95% CI 1.52–38.66); and for the third drug class compared to NNRTIs: RR 4.33 (95% CI 2.24–8.35) for a single PI; RR 2.46 (95% CI 1.48–4.08) for PIs/r, and RR 11.9 (95% CI 2.09–67.48) for NRTIs alone. Results were similar in sensitivity analyses using the alternative cut-offs of 10% and 30% reductions from pre-cART levels (data not shown). In 437 patients who had a value of eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the time of starting cART (68% of the total 644 who started cART), the median eGFR value was 109 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 99–121 mL/min/1.73 m2). In this subset, we observed 104 patients who experienced a decrease in eGFR to a value of <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 over a total of 846 PYFU for a crude incidence rate of 12.3 per 100 PYFU (95% CI 10.2–14.7).