However, simple enucleation showed excellent results in some retr

However, simple enucleation showed excellent results in some retrospective series. We compared the oncologic outcomes after standard partial nephrectomy and simple enucleation.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 982 patients who underwent standard partial nephrectomy and 537 who had simple enucleation for localized renal cell carcinoma at 16 academic centers between 1997 and 2007. Local recurrence, cancer specific survival and progression-free survival were the main outcomes of this study. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival functions and differences were assessed with the log rank statistic. Univariable and multivariable

Cox regression VE-821 research buy models addressed progression-free survival and cancer specific survival.

Results: Median followup of the patients undergoing traditional partial nephrectomy and simple enucleation was 51 +/- 37.8 and 54.4 +/- 36 months, respectively (p = 0.08). The 5 and 10-year progression-free survival estimates were 88.9 and 82% after standard partial nephrectomy, and 91.4% and 90.8% after simple enucleation (p = 0.09). The 5 and 10-year cancer specific survival estimates were 93.9% and 91.6% after standard partial

nephrectomy, and 94.3% and 93.2% after simple enucleation (p = 0.94). On multivariable analysis the adopted nephron sparing surgery technique was not an independent predictor of progression-free survival (HR 0.8, p = 0.55) this website and cancer specific survival (HR 0.7, p = 0.53) when adjusted for the effect of the other covariates.

Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first multicenter, comparative study showing oncologic equivalence of standard partial nephrectomy and simple enucleation.”
“Purpose: Renal cell carcinoma is sometimes associated with bone metastasis. Several risk factors have been reported but some Erythromycin are still controversial. Also, the significance of laboratory tests has not been fully examined for such cases.

Materials and Methods: We collected data on 94 renal cell carcinoma cases with bone metastasis treated at 3 tertiary referral centers.

Clinicopathological parameters and outcome data were analyzed to search for predictors of overall survival retrospectively. The log rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively.

Results: There were 64 males with a median age of 63.9 years. Histological diagnosis showed clear cell renal cell carcinoma in 63 patients, nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma in 7 and unclassified cancer in 6. Sarcomatoid differentiation was found in 17 cases. Metastasis was detected synchronously in 37 patients or metachronously at a median interval of 33.1 months. Multivariate analysis identified sarcomatoid differentiation (p = 0.001), vertebral bone involvement (p = 0.003), extraosseous metastasis (p = 0.021), alkaline phosphatase increased to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (p = 0.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>