Table 1 DNA:DNA relatedness percentages between representatives of two novel Enterobacter species and closely-related species   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 100               2 89(4) 100             3 33(16) 38(10) 100           4 31(17) 33(10) 93(6) 100         5 35(2) 33(9) 35(17) 31(7) 100       6 32(10) 35(2) 59(7) 58(3)

33(2) 100     7 39(9) 41(3) / 61(9) 43(8) 79(6) 100   8 33(8) 31(1) 63(8) 60(14) 33(21) 66(17) 71(2) 100 The data are based on means of at least 4 hybridizations. The www.selleckchem.com/products/Imatinib-Mesylate.html values given between brackets are the differences between the reciprocal values. Taxa: 1, Enterobacter oryzendophyticus REICA_032; 2, Enterobacter oryzendophyticus REICA_082T; 3, Enterobacter oryziphilus REICA_142T; 4, Enterobacter oryziphilus REICA_191; 5, Enterobacter cowanii LMG 23569T; 6, Enterobacter radicincitans LMG 23767T; 7, Enterobacter oryzae LMG 24251T; 8, Enterobacter

arachidis LMG 26131T. CH5183284 Furthermore, group-I type strain REICA_142T DNA showed only about 35-60% relatedness with the DNA of the closest relatives E. arachidis LMG 26131T (63% ±8), E radicincitans LMG 23767T (59% ±7) and E. cowanii LMG selleckchem 23569T (35% ±17). This finding is consistent with the contention that the group-I strains indeed form a separate species, within the genus Enterobacter. Similarly, strain REICA_082T genomic DNA revealed relatedness values that were significantly below the 70% cut-off value with that of the closest-related strains E. oryzae LMG 24251T (41% ±3), E. radicincitans LMG 23767T (35% ±2), E. cowanii LMG 23569T (33% ±9) and E. arachidis LMG 26131T (31% ±1) (Table 1). Again, this finding supports our contention that also the group-II strains form a separate species within the genus Enterobacter. It was interesting to note that the DNA-DNA relatedness values between E. radicincitans LMG 23767T and E. oryzae LMG 24251T (79% ±6) and between E. radicincitans LMG 23767T and E. arachidis LMG 26131T (66% ±17), in our experiments, were much higher than those reported by the original authors [3]. Support for the robustness

of our data is provided by the phylogenetic relationships revealed by the rpoB gene sequences, where E. radicincitans D5/23T and E. arachidis Phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase Ah-143T were 98.9% similar. These data were further consistent with the cellular fatty acid profile data (see below), which were indistinguishable at strain level. The overall genomic DNA G+C content was determined according to the HPLC method [20] using the DNA prepared for the DNA:DNA hybridization analyses. The values (means of three independent analyses of the same DNA sample) for the selected group-II strains REICA_032 and REICA_082T and group-I strains REICA_142T and REICA_191 were 52.7, 52.9, and 52.1 and 51.7 mol%, respectively. These values are within the lower range of the DNA mol% G + C, i.e. 52–60 %, of all members of the genus Enterobacter[21].