The authors are grateful to , New Delhi, India, for financial assistance (SRF) to Naresh Kumar. “
“For the past 30 years, the number of promising feedstocks

for biofuels (ethanol and biodiesel) production in the US has increased check details considerably, and so have prospects for the biofuels technologies of the future. With the strong support of the US Government for renewable energies, second generation biofuels have become one of the major prospective investments of the biofuels industry sector as well as biotechnology R&D. First generation biofuels from edible crops (e.g., corn, soybean, canola) (also called conventional biofuels) have been criticized for their competing with food and feed production, especially

in the face of unexpected weather events and climate change [1]. The currently investigated and produced second generation biofuels (belonging to the group of advanced biofuels) are not competing with food/feed production in a direct way. They comprise: ethanol from cellulosic plant material, e.g., switchgrass, miscanthus, poplar, and biodiesel from oil plants, e.g., jatropha, oil palm as well as biofuel from algae. According to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) that has mandated biofuels production in the US since the establishment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 36 billion gallons (136 billion l) of biofuels are supposed to be supplied to the market by 2022. Advanced biofuels need to constitute 58.3% of the total mandate. In 2010, the RFS was extended by RFS2, setting new standards for conventional and advanced biofuels in terms of production Buparlisib clinical trial volumes and life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Thus, for instance, cellulosic ethanol is supposed to be supplied at the volume of 16 million gallons (60.5 million l) by 2022 and to guarantee 60% CO2 savings compared to fossil fuels [2]. Due to a mismatch between the mandate requirements and the actual production of cellulosic ethanol, the mandate has been adjusted and downsized by the Celecoxib Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) via waivers in all previous

years. Despite that, both policy makers and scientists agree that second generation biofuels represent a prospective solution of the future and can be more viable in the long-term than conventional biofuels. One of the major problems that did not allow for the advanced biofuels technology (especially cellulosic ethanol) to develop on a large commercial scale yet is the technological impediment of breaking down plant biomass (lignin in the plant walls) and releasing carbohydrate polymers (cellulose and hemicellulose) that can be converted into fermentable sugars and further refined into fuels. In addition, new highly efficient feedstocks are being unveiled as a sustainable biofuel source that could potentially outperform the currently applied second generation biofuels feedstocks.