Once incorporated into the surface, individual Bi atoms

tend to move from nearest neighbours to C188-9 solubility dmso next-nearest neighbours to minimize strain, thus generating atomic rows of alternating Bi and As [9]. Whilst this happens in a homogeneous manner on the flat surface leading to an S of 1, only the peaks contribute to this on the undulating surface, and hence, the ordering parameter is lower where the macroscopic distribution of the ordered Bi clusters corresponds to the period of the surface undulations present during growth. Thus, growth of thicker GaAsBi layers with homogeneous Bi content would require prevention of or restoration from the inherent undulating surface caused by the (2 × 1) reconstruction. Conclusions HSP inhibitor In summary, we have analysed by optical and transmission Metabolism inhibitor electron microscopy techniques two GaAsBi layers grown by MBE with different thicknesses. Compositional analyses show that the bismuth content decreases exponentially in the first 25 nm from a maximum for both samples, followed by a region of almost constant Bi content in the thicker

layer. This is consistent with the asymmetric shape of the PL emission peak in both cases, and the thicker layer behaves as a GaAsBi bilayer with two different compositions. CuPtB-type ordering is observed in SAED patterns and FFT analysis of HRTEM images. We have developed RGB multilayer maps showing the spatial locations of the two (111) ordering families in the layers. In addition, LRO parameter estimation from FFT intensities shows that ordering is almost complete NADPH-cytochrome-c2 reductase in the lower region and diminishes in the upper region of the GaAsBi layers. A correlation between degree of ordering and dominant Bi incorporation mechanism is proposed. Acknowledgements This work has been supported by MICINN (Project No. MAT2010-15206 and TEC2011-29120-C05-03), the JA (Project No. P09-TEP-5403)

and by the EU (COST Action MP0805). The authors wish to thank Dr. Richard Beanland for critically reading and discussing the manuscript. References 1. Tixier S, Adamcyk M, Tiedje T, Francoeur S, Mascarenhas A, Wei P, Schiettekatte F: Molecular beam epitaxy growth of GaAs1-xBix. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 82:2245–2247.CrossRef 2. Francoeur S, Seong MJ, Mascarenhas A, Tixier S, Adamcyk M, Tiedje T: Band gap of GaAs1-xBix, 0 < x <3.6%. Appl Phys Lett 2003, 82:3874–3876.CrossRef 3. Fluegel B, Francoeur S, Mascarenhas A, Tixier S, Young EC, Tiedje T: Giant spin-orbit bowing in GaAs1-xBix. Phys Rev Lett 2006, 97:067205.CrossRef 4. Lu XF, Beaton DA, Lewis RB, Tiedje T, Zhang Y: Composition dependence of photoluminescence of GaAs1-xBix alloys. Appl Phys Lett 2009, 95:041903–041903–3.CrossRef 5. Mohmad AR, Bastiman F, Hunter CJ, Ng JS, Sweeney SJ, David JPR: The effect of Bi composition to the optical quality of GaAs(1-x)Bi(x). Appl Phys Lett 2011, 99:042107–042107–3.CrossRef 6. Zhang S, Zunger A: Surface-reconstruction-enhanced solubility of N, P, As, and Sb in III-V semiconductors.